[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?)
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?) |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:07:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:
> I questioned only the purpose of having a library, apparently
> `subr.el',
(I think you mean subr-x.)
> whose _purpose_ is to act as a sort of sandbox of stuff that, for
> whatever reason, someone doesn't consider quite ready for primetime.
I don't have a strong opinion about it. But I think the approach works:
interested people use this stuff - privately, but also in Emacs - and
the stuff develops. Stuff that proved useful can later be moved to
other places. OTOH, if you think about things that happened there (like
`when-let' and `if-let' having been obsoleted and replaced by `if-let*',
`when-let*' and `and-let*', not long after that had been added), it is
not too bad that not every Emacs user and package developer had already
used it.
But maybe subr-x is also a symptom of limited manpower: if we had hordes
of people volunteering writing and updating documentation, we would
probably be less reluctant to fully integrate and document this stuff in
the first place.
Michael.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/08
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?),
Michael Heerdegen <=
- RE: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Re: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/11