[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flymake refactored
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: Flymake refactored |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Oct 2017 16:13:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>> address@hidden (João Távora) writes:
>>> Nice. Adding to the pile, a LaTeX checker with chktex below.
>> Keep'em coming. Later we should compile a list of these and decide how
>> to distribute them. Perhaps they're too late for emacs-26, but not for a
>> some ELPA "flymake-backends" package.
>
> I think the Python backend would naturally belong in python.el and the Ruby
> backend in ruby-mode.el.
> Similarly the LaTeX backend would naturally fit in tex-mode.el.
Yes, that is the natural way. But should it go into the emacs-26 branch?
Or rather wait for the rewrite to be merged to master and wait for Emacs
27? In the latter case, I think a package is useful.
João
- Re: Flymake refactored, (continued)
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored,
João Távora <=
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/08