Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build

[Paul Eggert]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> these are minor stylistic differences

Although they are minor, they are semantic differences not stylistic. UNINIT is 
better on technical grounds; among other things, it causes GCC to generate 
more-efficient code in production builds.

As the main objection to UNINIT appears to be stylistic, perhaps we can 
ameliorate that somehow. We could change its name to ATTRIBUTE_UNINIT, say, so 
that declarations look like this:

  Lisp_Object dest ATTRIBUTE_UNINIT;

Would that be better?