[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User-defined record types, v2
From: |
Lars Brinkhoff |
Subject: |
Re: User-defined record types, v2 |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:57:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> I'm trying to make progress on this. If we bump the version of the
>> generated elc files from 23 to 24, we can check for that.
>
> I think it's OK to ask the user to explicitly enable the compatibility
> code. It's also a way to make the user aware of the issue and
> motivate him to recompile his files.
Ok, I'll drop that commit then. But I suppose the check in
cl-struct-define can stay?
Once that is fixed, I believe the branch is ready for merging. As far
as I know. Should I wait for a "go" or "no go" decision from someone?
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, (continued)
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/22
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/23
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/23
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/23
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/23
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/24
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/24
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/24
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/29
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/30
- Re: User-defined record types, v2,
Lars Brinkhoff <=
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Stefan Monnier, 2017/03/30
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/30
- Re: User-defined record types, v2, Lars Brinkhoff, 2017/03/22