[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: official Emacs Docker image
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: official Emacs Docker image |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:21:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:53:27 -0500 Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I went to Docker Hub, turned off JS, and was able to use the settings
>> dialogs necessary to maintain the "gnuemacs" account going forward.
>> Account creation also seemed to work.
RS> That's sounds favorable. But could you please compare notes with Mike
RS> Gurwitz about what does or doesn't require nonfree JS code? You and
RS> he are getting different results; the anomaly is troubling.
Unfortunately I was rushed and meant to write "organization account
creation" within an existing Docker Hub user account (you need one to
create an organization). I did not test creating the user account. But I
don't think any of that will make a difference.
At this point I've lost interest and will not continue this work. I
don't see a way to reconcile your positions with my reality, and can't
change either.
RS> Please don't try to push us to "move on" without establishing
RS> the facts of the situation clearly.
I think we can move on with other things now.
Thanks
Ted
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/02/01
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Richard Stallman, 2017/02/01
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Mike Gerwitz, 2017/02/02
- Re: official Emacs Docker image,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/02/03
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Richard Stallman, 2017/02/03
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/02/03
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/02/03
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Filipe Silva, 2017/02/03
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/02/03
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Filipe Silva, 2017/02/03