|
From: | Eric Ludlam |
Subject: | Re: CEDET Merge |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:06:25 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
On 01/18/2017 04:57 PM, David Engster wrote:
My worry is indeed feature creep. The CEDET merge fell behind because I couldn't keep up with the changes in Emacs, most notably the switch to git and the extensive changes in EIEIO. The code base is very large and complicated, so I'm against adding more code to Emacs core. Instead, we should try to make it more modular and put support for certain languages and project types into separate ELPA projects. This would also make it easier to share maintainership of CEDET.
I agree with David. Making it easy to create and maintain different extensions independent of CEDET core will be a big win.
Eric
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |