[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: official Emacs Docker image
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: official Emacs Docker image |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Jan 2017 10:03:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 |
Elias Mårtenson <address@hidden> writes:
> On 1 January 2017 at 06:04, Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > However, I don't see any ethical issue about making and distributing
>> > Docker images of Emacs as long as we get the details right: for
>> > instance, use an endorsed free GNU/Linux distro.
>>
>> We could use Guix to generate the image contents from scratch, i.e. we
>> wouldn’t even have to use a “base image” (usually a minimal GNU/Linux
>> system). The idea is to export the package closure for the “emacs”
>> package from the Guix store (this includes all runtime dependencies) and
>> wrap up the files in a plain docker image.
>>
>
> Arguably there should be a fully free distribution that could be the base
> for more than just Emacs.
GuixSD is a fully free GNU distribution and it comes with the tools that
are needed to determine runtime dependencies that can then turned into a
Docker image. Since Guix is a functional package manager and thus can
account for the full closure of a package it doesn’t require a base
image and can be the base itself.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
http://elephly.net
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/01/27
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Filipe Silva, 2017/01/27
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/01/30
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/01/30
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/01/30
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Filipe Silva, 2017/01/30
- Re: official Emacs Docker image, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/01/31