[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:58:02 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) |
>>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> When the developers of a free program decide which features to include,
> including which platforms or interoperation to support, the question at
> stake is not what uses to _allow_, but rather which uses to _facilitate_.
I do see what you mean. If a volunteer is willing to give us code to support
using lldb, does it then become a question of which uses to _not facilitate_?
That's really what I reacting to. I totally understand not *making an effort*
to support something that might inhibit the growth of gdb; but if we're in the
position of receiving code to support lldb, then should the same argument be
used to deny its acceptance. Or is this not what you're saying?
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: lldb support, Joseph Mingrone, 2016/11/15
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/16
- Re: lldb support, Sam Steingold, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09