[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:43:28 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:13:45 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Besides, at this point it borders on technical malpractice to suggest
> >> to users that it's OK to use Windows 9x to run Emacs.
> >
> > How can this be a malpractice, technical or otherwise?
>
> Windows 9X is a virus magnet and reservoir.
Which has nothing to do with Emacs, even if it's true.
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/06