|
From: | Alain Schneble |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added |
Date: | Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:20:13 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (windows-nt) |
address@hidden (Phillip Lord) writes: > a) > > EMACS/lisp/blah.el > EMACS/packages/foo/foo.el ^^^^^^^^ What about elpa instead of packages? It's 4 chars as 'lisp'. > which is nice because it cleanly separates out the two layouts. > > b) > > EMACS/lisp/elpa/packages/foo/foo.el ^^^^^^^^ elpa would suffice, I think. Or is there a reason for the nested packages directory? > EMACS/lisp/unified/blah.el > > which also seperates the two layouts, but would require lots of file > moves form the current system. > > Or c) > > EMACS/lisp/blah.el > EMACS/lisp/elpa/packages/foo/foo.el ^^^^^^^^ Same here. Regards, Alain
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |