[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:59:12 +0300 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:33:51 +0200
>
> Consider admitting that you are wrong. Doing it is a sign of strength.
This goes both ways, you know.
Anyway, if we are still talking about Dired and having
dired-mark-extension unmark as well as mark, then I proposed a
solution yesterday that should let us eat the cake and have it, too.
I hope it could become a middle ground and let us move on to more
important issues.
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, (continued)
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, John Wiegley, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, John Wiegley, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/24