|
From: | Daniel Colascione |
Subject: | Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining] |
Date: | Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:27:37 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
On 08/29/2016 11:16 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 21:04:42 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden That single case of #1 is revert-bufferBtw: not every call to revert-buffer hits this case. Quite the contrary: almost none of them do. IOW, the situation where the before-change hook is not called at all is very rare even if you only consider the uses of revert-buffer.
I think we fundamentally disagree about how rarity affects bug important: You: "This bug is rare. Cool. We don't have to worry about it much."Me: "This bug is rare. That's awful. That means that people won't hit this bug until it causes some horrible, non-reproducible problem."
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |