On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Aug 25 2016, Tino Calancha <address@hidden> wrote:
* If program is nil, for instance,
(start-process "foo" "buf" nil)
which IMO it shouldn't ever happend, that check don't
prevent the creation of a useless process.
nil is explicitly documented as a meaningful argument.
You are right. Thanks!
Maybe in my example has no much sense, i mean, just
(start-process "foo" "buf" nil)
but with additional arguments,
i.e.
(start-process "foo" "buf" nil args)
it might have sense.