[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Aug 2016 12:38:42 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> There are several functions in .../src/insdel.c which have a parameter
> `prepare'. The meaning of `prepare' is "direct the function to call
> prepare_to_modify_buffer" (YUCK!).
Why do you say "yuck" to that?
I'm not saying it can't have problems, or that you can't
think of some change for the better. However, to merit "yuck",
it would have to be grossly and conspicuously bad.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/01
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/02
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/02
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/08/08