[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook
From: |
Mark Oteiza |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:44:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1+26 (8e342d73159b) (2016-04-27) |
On 12/06/16 at 09:57pm, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> On 06/12/2016 09:52 PM, Mark Oteiza wrote:
>
> > > Could we improve the display of function values instead?
> >
> > Why not both? AFAICT the current behavior in eldoc is an imitation of
> > what hooks do already.
>
> add-function is more powerful than hooks, see the different ways you can
> combine the functions.
That does not mean we should be using advice where hooks are a natural
solution.
Nothing prevents you from using add-function on a hook or a function
that is part of a hook.
- [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/06/12
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Noam Postavsky, 2016/06/12
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/06/12
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/06/12
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook,
Mark Oteiza <=
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/06/12
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Richard Stallman, 2016/06/13
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/06/18
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Richard Stallman, 2016/06/20
- Re: [PATCH] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Leo Liu, 2016/06/13