RE: New Package for GNU ELPA

[Drew Adams]

> >  '(("(\\(define-hook-helper\\)\\_>[ \t]*\\(\\(?:\\sw\\|\\s_\\)+\\)?"
...
> >    ("(\\(define-mode-hook-helper\\)\\_>[ \t]*\\(\\(?:\\sw\\|\\s_\\)+\\)?"
...
> 
> Is there a reason why these two macros aren't highlighted properly by
> default? I don't think other packages do this.

If this is a package in GNU ELPA, shouldn't its thingies have a
package prefix?

IOW, shouldn't `define(-mode)-hook-helper' be called something like
`hkhlp-define(-mode)-hook-helper'?

I'm not saying it should, as the rules for GNU ELPA packages are not
clear to me.  But if its packages follow the general rule then they
should have a prefix, no?

(And if they did have a pkg prefix then no, these macros would
presumably not be highlighted by default.)