[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Apr 2016 05:22:07 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I think Bison and Lex are somewhat special cases; they each divide a
> file into three sections of equal status, rather than there being a
> containing mode and sections contained within it.
You may be right that this kind of case is less common,
but the system should still handle it.
> A workaround for this would be to have the first section being the
> "super mode" and containing the second and third sections. The
> delimiter "%%" between sections 2 and 3 has space to hold both an island
> close and an island open, despite what you say about this being
> artificial, etc.
That could work, but I think it would be cleaner if "island separator"
were allowed too.
> I don't see there would be an absolute need for there
> to be a "close island" mark at the end of the buffer.
I don't either. I just thought the design required one.
If it doesn't, that is fine with me.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/22
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/22