|
| From: | Dmitry Gutov |
| Subject: | Re: Docstrings and manuals |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:50:22 +0300 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 |
On 04/18/2016 11:38 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
That's not necessarily a flaw. The fact that mapatoms returns nil is not very important for using it. Maybe it is worth mentioning in the manual but not important enough for the doc string.
How come it can be more important to mention in the manual? Returning nil is either a part of the function's contract, or not.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |