[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thinking about changed buffers
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Thinking about changed buffers |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Apr 2016 01:44:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Clément Pit--Claudel <address@hidden> writes:
>>> But one take away from this discussion is that Emacs needs a
>>> convenient command to save an unchanged buffer. I think I'll file a
>>> wishlist bug report for that.
>>
>> C-x C-w RET will do that, and I use it often for that effect.
>
> You need two `RET's, actually, don't you?
To be precise:
C-x C-w RET y RET
> And it shows a scary
> overwrite message. Also, it doesn't work with ido-mode, unfortunately.
For avoiding the scary overwrite confirmation you use the prefix
argument:
C-u C-x C-w RET
Those of us who use ido-mode:
C-u C-x C-w C-j
IMO, those sequences are above of the threshold of what can be
considered convenient (definitely not recommended if you are prone to
suffering from RSI) and I expressed my preference for a new shorcut.
However, others were quick at dismissing that possibility.
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, John Wiegley, 2016/04/03
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, John Wiegley, 2016/04/03
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/03
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, John Wiegley, 2016/04/03
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/03
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/04/03
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, John Wiegley, 2016/04/04