|
From: | Leo Liu |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode |
Date: | Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:36:13 +0800 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (OS X 10.11.3) |
On 2016-03-01 09:24 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > That should at least give one example where adding (indent 3) hurts. define-derived-mode is available since at least emacs 22.1 without any (indent N) settings. I think maybe it is better to think in the other direction that is what does (indent 3) bring to the table? is it worth breaking 10 years of practice? Personally I have code that looks like this: (define-derived-mode lcnt-mode special-mode nil :abbrev-table nil ...) If you insist I'll append that example to the comment. Thanks, Leo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |