[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:52:53 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I think the dump-and-reload cycle resets global variables defined in
> libraries as long as they are not referenced by the main program. This
> means libraries have difficulties to retain references to objects
> allocated before the dump.
Variables allocated by static libraries are stored like variables
allocated in any other file. Their value should be dumped.
I don't know what happens with shared libraries, but
> This
> means libraries have difficulties to retain references to objects
> allocated before the dump.
if that were true, we would see enormous problems, so I think it
must not be true.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, (continued)
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Richard Stallman, 2016/01/23
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Florian Weimer, 2016/01/26
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/26
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/26
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Florian Weimer, 2016/01/27
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/27
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Richard Stallman, 2016/01/27
- Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc, Florian Weimer, 2016/01/18