[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault
From: |
Masaru Nomiya |
Subject: |
Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:55:47 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Goj$(D+W(B) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/25.1.50 (x86_64-openSUSE-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
Hello,
In the Message;
Subject : Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault
Message-ID : <address@hidden>
Date & Time: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:45:26 +0900
Masaru Nomiya <address@hidden> has written:
> Hello,
> In the Message;
> Subject : Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault
> Message-ID : <address@hidden>
> Date & Time: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:04:39 +0900
> address@hidden (K. Handa) has written:
> > In article <address@hidden>, Masaru Nomiya <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > Thank you for the info. I've just installed a fix. Please try the
> > > > latest trunk code.
> > > Thanks a lot.
> > Does it mean that the segfault does not occur with the latest code?
> No, it doesn't.
That is, my segfault problem was solved with Handa-san's code.
Now, Emacs works fine for me.
---
M. Nomiya
- Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, (continued)
Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, K. Handa, 2016/01/13
- Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, Masaru Nomiya, 2016/01/13
- Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, K. Handa, 2016/01/14
- Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, Masaru Nomiya, 2016/01/14
- Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, K. Handa, 2016/01/20
- Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, Masaru Nomiya, 2016/01/20
- Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault,
Masaru Nomiya <=
- Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, K. Handa, 2016/01/22
Re: The very latest emacs (25.1.50) segfault, Masaru Nomiya, 2016/01/14