[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:07:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
> Sure. But I think this sort of "janitorial" fix-up is something that
> appeals to (some) people: They can do something that can be
> semi-automated, and have real noticeable progressive impact on Emacs
> usability.
But if the same rule applies to all N commands, repeating it for every
one of those commands introduces the same old maintainability problem as
copy&paste.
And having to annotate every Emacs package is "janitorial
enough", methinks. There's no need to make it even more tedious.
Stefan
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, (continued)
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/01/10
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional (was: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx), Marcin Borkowski, 2016/01/10
- Re: Making `interactive' conditional, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/11
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/09
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/09
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/09
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/01/10
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/10
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/01/10
Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Phillip Lord, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Phillip Lord, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Andrew Hyatt, 2016/01/08
- Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/09
- Re: 4K Bugs, Phillip Lord, 2016/01/11
Re: 4K Bugs, Stephen Leake, 2016/01/08
Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/08