[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags-loop-continue
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: tags-loop-continue |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Jan 2016 22:42:28 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:22:40 +0300
>
> On 01/09/2016 10:36 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > It looks like we cannot obsolete this command, because tags-search and
> > tags-query-replace, which need it, don't have any xref equivalents and
> > are not obsolete.
>
> I suppose so.
Of course, the real bummer would be that it no longer has a key
binding, and its previous one is taken. Maybe we should rebind
xref-pop-marker-stack back to 'M-*' and leave tags-loop-continue on
'M-,', WDYT?
- tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/09
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Ingo Lohmar, 2016/01/09
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/09
- Re: tags-loop-continue,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/09
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/09
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/09
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/09
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/09
- RE: tags-loop-continue, Drew Adams, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Ingo Lohmar, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/10
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/10