|
From: | Oleh Krehel |
Subject: | Re: Can we not introduce frivolous indentation change to define-minor-mode? |
Date: | Wed, 06 Jan 2016 13:38:02 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Leo Liu <address@hidden> writes: > Secondly those forms already indent correctly without introducing > (indent 1) Not true. Here's the indentation without an indent spec: (define-minor-mode ace-window-display-mode "Minor mode for showing the ace window key in the mode line." :global t) Here's the correct indentation with (indent 1) spec: (define-minor-mode ace-window-display-mode "Minor mode for showing the ace window key in the mode line." :global t) This applies when (setq lisp-indent-function 'common-lisp-indent-function) is used. > I'd like to revert the change to keep the behaviour > consistent with previous emacsen. WDYT? I'm against the revert. I'd like to keep using `common-lisp-indent-function' without extra configuration.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |