[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Mac port
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Mac port |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:37:26 +0000 |
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:00 AM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I'd like to hear what others think. Do you want to have a restricted
> version of the Mac port in the mainline? Will you use it in
> preference to the full-feature version distributed separately (e.g.,
> via another git repository)?
Yes!
Mostly due to the fact that, while the mac port's features are super-nice,
I want to develop in emacs's trunk, and so I almost always decide to
use the normal nextstep build.
I miss a lot of the mac port's features there... But I don't use it anymore.
To be honest, I haven't looked if there's a way to "git merge" the tip of
the mac port with the tip of trunk for to do development while having nice
mac-port features for doing that development.
João
- Re: Emacs Mac port, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Mac port, John Wiegley, 2016/01/02
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Bozhidar Batsov, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, John Wiegley, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/01/04
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Chad Brown, 2016/01/04
- Re: Emacs Mac port, John Wiegley, 2016/01/04
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Alan Schmitt, 2016/01/06
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Martin Yrjölä, 2016/01/05
- Re: Emacs Mac port,
João Távora <=
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Paul Michael Reilly, 2016/01/05
- Re: Emacs Mac port, John Wiegley, 2016/01/03
- Re: Emacs Mac port, Xu Xin, 2016/01/04