Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc.

[Paul Eggert]

Daniel Colascione wrote:
> It's the opinion of two people, one of whom
> previously said that the worst side effect of this scheme is a potential
> memory leak

I don't recall anyone making such a statement. For what it's worth, I agree with 
you that Emacs's current approach can result in hangs and crashes and in theory 
even worse behavior, and that it'd be nice to clean this up. We disagree about 
how likely these disasters are in practice, and therefore how high a priority it 
is to fix this, and whether we should remove otherwise-useful features in order 
to avert the disasters.