[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc. |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:20:06 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 08:50:00 -0800
>
> >> I see nothing wrong with advocacy.
> >
> > Neither do I. Just don't submit advocacy as a "summary" when a
> > decision-maker requests one in order to make up his/her mind.
>
> I presented your argument (such as it is), then presented mine. If you
> don't feel as though I've adequately presented your position, you can
> elaborate.
What you wrote after your presentation left that presentation tainted.
John obviously asked for a balanced summary, where each argument is
accompanied by its pros and contras. What you wrote was a far cry
from that.
Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., John Wiegley, 2016/01/03
- Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc., Paul Eggert, 2016/01/03