Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.

[Rasmus]

Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> writes:

>> I realize that I would probably be mostly OK if special behavior is
>> adopted when point is a column zero.  I’m still not sure that M-o warrants
>> such complexity, but I don’t feel too strongly about it.
>
> The complexity here is very manageable, and the function isn’t long.
> Besides, it’s a very frequently used command. It’s worth investing and
> extra 4 or 5 lines to make it more natural.

I was referring to the additional ’cognitive complexity’ given the
conditional behavior of M-o.  But it may indeed fall under DWIM.

Thanks for the effort, Artur.

Rasmus

-- 
Hvor meget poesi tror De kommer ud af et glas isvand?