[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
David Engster |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:38:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Ludlam writes:
> On 10/16/2015 07:17 AM, Przemysław Wojnowski wrote:
>>>> BTW Why EDE (and CEDET) are in two different repositories (and
>>>> projects?).
>>>> One is in Emacs sources, another here
>
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/cedet/ ?
>>>
>>> CEDET is in Emacs sources as well (although is has some
>>> omissions). See lisp/cedet.
>> Yes, so when one would like change EDE to, lets say, apply the
>> Bridge pattern,
>> which one should be used?
>> .
>
> Good question. The recent EIEIO changes in Emacs made the two
> repositories really hard to merge, and EDE is steeped in EIEIO.
>
> David Engster has been doing the merges and might have a good
> idea. I'm just not that good with git. ;(
At the moment it is best to work in the Emacs repository.
-David
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/19
- Re: IDE, Lluís, 2015/10/20
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/20
- Re: IDE, Lluís, 2015/10/21
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/21
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/20
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/20
- Re: IDE, Lluís, 2015/10/21
- Re: IDE, Xue Fuqiao, 2015/10/16
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/16
- Re: IDE,
David Engster <=
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/16
- Is EDE only intended to be used with languages which /require/ a 'compile' step? [was: Re: IDE], Alexis, 2015/10/16
- Re: Is EDE only intended to be used with languages which /require/ a 'compile' step? [was: Re: IDE], Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/17
- Re: Is EDE only intended to be used with languages which /require/ a 'compile' step? [was: Re: IDE], Alexis, 2015/10/22
- Re: Is EDE only intended to be used with languages which /require/ a 'compile' step? [was: Re: IDE], Aaron Ecay, 2015/10/22
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/15
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Tom, 2015/10/12
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Nix, 2015/10/24