[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib? |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 22:28:53 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
On 10/01/2015 10:12 PM, John Wiegley wrote:
>>>>>> Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Commit d605a539d4863c7e7c66aaea6e538ae14c47f3d7 broke Emacs when winner was
>> enabled without cl-lib being loaded. Nobody seems to have noticed until now,
>> which suggests that either almost nobody uses winner, or almost everybody
>> has cl-lib loaded anyway. Maybe it's time to just dump cl-lib with Emacs.
>
> I use winner, but always have cl-lib loaded.
So does almost everyone else, apparently. So let's save everyone some
initialization CPU time and preload cl-lib.
> As for dumping it into Emacs; is
> there a precedent for including Lisp libraries of this type into core?
XEmacs does it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Rasmus, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/10/08
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Mark Oteiza, 2015/10/08