Re: seq-some-p and nil

[Nicolas Petton]

Simen Heggestøyl <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Simen,

> Ah, sorry, I should have been clearer. What I meant was that it could
> guarantee to return the *first* non-nil value that resulted from
> applying the predicate, like in CL.
>
> So for instance, (seq-some #'1+ '(1 3 5)) could guarantee to return 2,
> not 4 or 6.

You lost me.  Isn't that exactly what `seq-some' does?

    (seq-some #'1+ '(1 3 5)) ;; => 2

Or did you mean that the documentation of `seq-some' should state that
`seq-some' returns the first non-nil value?

Cheers,
Nico

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature