[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intermediate tutorial shipped with Emacs
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: Intermediate tutorial shipped with Emacs |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Sep 2015 21:25:21 +0200 |
On 2015-09-19, at 09:22, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Spencer Baugh <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:19:41 -0400
>>
>> As an example, consider narrowing. If a user didn't already know
>> narrowing existed, they probably wouldn't even bother searching for the
>> feature; it isn't obvious how useful until you know about it. A user
>> without knowledge of narrowing would use other hacks.
>
> A very good example. Narrowing is described in the manual in a
> 58-line section. How would you go about giving the user a "taste of"
> narrowing, without essentially telling the same story in slightly
> different words? It's not trivial (but not impossible, either).
My 2 cents:
* I like the idea of having "batteries included", and the tutorial being
part of Emacs. However, aren't e.g. Sacha Chua's Emacs chats better
for that purpose, where a human being explains his particular
use-case?
* Also, along these lines: maybe such tutorials should be centered
around "scenarios", and not features? Like, take a "scenario" called
"C editing". Then you can mention narrowing, compilation mode, maybe
rgrep and a few other things. Or, take a scenario "HTML editing".
Then you can have SGML mode, TRAMP, maybe Org-mode and exporting, etc.
Also, in such tutorials it would make sense to mention ELPA packages
(and possibly MELPA, too).
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University