Re: seq-some-p and nil

[Mark Oteiza]

Nicolas Petton <address@hidden> writes:

> John Mastro <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Agreed, and that's not the only case.
>>> Both `seq-some-p' and `seq-contains-p' are named as predicates but do
>>> not behave as predicates.
>>
>> I think `seq-some-p' (or its successor) would also be more useful if it
>> promised to return the first matching element (the docstring says "any
>> element", though in practice it does return the first).
>
> Indeed, I agree.  I will update its docstring.

I also liked seq-some-p returning the matching element over cl-some
returning the value returned by the predicate.

Perhaps there could be a function in seq that preserves this behavior.