[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:30:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> In an effort to make the mark and mark-active be window-local (like the
> point) and not buffer-local, I've started learning the way that the
BTW, since our last discussion about it, I'm not sure it's going to be
a good change for everyone: when the mark is used to select a region on
which to operate, it'll usually be preferable for that mark to be
window-local, but for people who use the mark as a simple "remember this
location", they may occasionally by disappointed that it's not shared
among the various windows of a buffer.
Also, the mark-ring will definitely not want to become window-local, so
having a window-local mark but a buffer-local mark-ring could lead to
further surprises.
Not to say that it would be a bad change, but that it may require
a fair bit of twiddling until everyone's happy with it.
Stefan
- Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, (continued)
- Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/04/23
- Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/04/23
- Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
- Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/23
- Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?,
Stefan Monnier <=