Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Oleh Krehel <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:05:28 +0200
> 
> Is there anything else that needs to be done before merging?

Please wait for the discussion of this issue to settle down:

> Wasn't that underscore introduced for the concurrency branch?  E.g.,
> see KVAR and BVAR macros.  I think the idea was to prevent people from
> writing code that directly accesses these fields, which is bad for
> concurrency.

It's possible that we will want the underscore to be left alone, at
least in some structures.