Re: Is there a way to inhibit message3 from Elisp?

[Stefan Monnier]

>> desired in general.  It's OK to emit such a message if call-process ends
>> up waiting a non-negligible amount of time for the subprocess to die
>> (so as to explain to the user why Emacs is not responding), but for the
>> usual case where wait_for_termination returns quickly, we should not
>> emit any message at all.
>> Patch welcome to fix this problem.
> Please check the scratch/inhibit-message3 branch.

It's easier if you include the patch in your email messages.

And this patch doesn't seem to address the problem you quoted.


        Stefan