Re: Silencing noise

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

raman writes:

 > thinking forward to concutrrent/multi-threaded emacs, it would be
 > ideal if messages displayed from a thread running in a frame was
 > limited to that frame.

Does that actually make sense?  The point of threads is shared state,
a thread might very well be accessing multiple buffers/frames.

 > Food for thought: Should we in that world have a single *Messages*
 > buffer where all messages land up -- or a per-frame *Messages*
 > buffer with an additional Global-Messages buffer that shows up
 > everywhere -- that message queue could then be sued to display
 > truly urgent alerts etc.

That's an interesting idea.