[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: map.el and naming
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: map.el and naming |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:25:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Would it be plausible to name the library "map.el", but name the
> functions "m-" instead of "map-" (i.e., abbreviate the library name)?
Yes, the problem under discussion is the prefix to use for the
functions. The name of the library is much less of an issue. Usually,
they're more or less the same, but they don't have to be.
Stefan
- Re: map.el and naming, Nicolas Petton, 2015/04/10
- Re: map.el and naming, John Yates, 2015/04/11
- Re: map.el and naming, John Mastro, 2015/04/11
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/11
- Re: map.el and naming, Daniel Colascione, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Nicolas Petton, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Yuri Khan, 2015/04/12
- Re: map.el and naming, Nicolas Petton, 2015/04/12