[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 02:00:27 +0100 |
2015-04-12 0:10 GMT+01:00 Vasilij Schneidermann <address@hidden>:
> Hello,
>
> I am surprised that option #2 is being favoured and has been met with a
> fair amount of discussion considering it's the hackier solution (why
> *add* text to the init file if one could merely *do* the package
> initialization step in startup.el, completely bypassing issues like init
> code possibly getting added multiple times to the file and the general
> annoyance as this cluttering cannot be disabled at all and can happen at
> every installation) and involves more work.
>
> Since option #1 wasn't discussed in the prior discussion, I'd suggest a
> third one, enabling packages in startup.el unless an Emacs-specific
> environment variable is set (or Emacs is started up in a special mode of
> operation). Doing so works cross-platform, avoids cluttering anything
> (be it an existing or new file) and is simple to get right.
>
> Any thoughts on this proposal?
I'm fine with this too. Like I said in the previous post, I'm just
glad this issue is up for the slaughter, I don't care whether we kill
it with a magnum or a tennis racket.
It's important to note that an extra envvar will probably need to be
documented in places I'm not aware of.
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/11
Message not availableRe: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Vasilij Schneidermann, 2015/04/12
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Artur Malabarba, 2015/04/12
Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization, Jorgen Schäfer, 2015/04/12