Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 2056db3: Rationalize use of c[ad]+r, expunging cl-c[ad]\{3, 4\}r.

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> If you want them without "cl-" then they need to go to subr.el. As I said,
> I'm not yet convinced it's a good idea, but I'm not necessarily dead set
> against it.

I do not like this cl- prefix generally, so as long as there is a way around
it, I'm OK.

With caaar in particular, the fact that switching from caar to caaar (and
back, which does happen in my coding) would require my knowing that I need to
add and remove a cl- prefix as I do so. Again, this is cured if cl.el has a
macro to drop the cl-.

John