Re: save-excursion and the mark

[Andreas Röhler]

On 25.02.2015 03:59, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > See for example indent-code-ridigly.
> Can you give more details about how this requires save&restore of the
> mark (or its "active" status)?
>
>
>          Stefan
Think a shifting code by TAB in python-mode.

Mark might exist somewhere in line. Shifting will use its own region - but 
original region should be restored - if any.
Shifting by itself should not create a region nor clutter the mark-ring.

BTW you didn't tell whats the reason of the change:
Maybe it's worth reconsidering

commit b1d6ddd44614c84746f5ee494e1f29cd9be8a2d8

Notable changes to goto-line, i.e. calling push-mark.

Just an idea,

Andreas