[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function liter
From: |
Oleh |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:05:11 +0100 |
> Sure. My point is that existence of prettify-symbols-mode and equivalent
> is another argument against the creation of a shorter-than-lambda
> function literal syntax.
Note that this isn't just a lame
(defalias 'λ 'lambda)
we're talking about here. `short-lambda' takes away a *whole* paren
nesting level, which can be a lot, when there's only two (and there
usually is).
It makes these one-line lambdas more pleasant to look at, they appear
as simple atoms in the code, instead of structures, as they would:
(let ((foo (lambda (x) (+ x x)))
(bar #(+ % %)))
(list (funcall foo 5)
(funcall bar 6)))
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, (continued)
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, René Kyllingstad, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Daniel Colascione, 2015/01/22
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal,
Oleh <=
- Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Ivan Andrus, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Leo Liu, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/01/24
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, Oleh, 2015/01/22
Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal, David Kastrup, 2015/01/22