[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HTML-Info design
From: |
Steinar Bang |
Subject: |
Re: HTML-Info design |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:40:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) |
>>>>> David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> And Lisp code is even easier to process. But HTML is HTML and XML is
> XML and XHTML is XHTML and SGML is SGML. Whether or not XHTML is
> easier to process, web browsers are talking HTML.
I really feel the urge to go in to teaspoon mode, bring up some old
90-ies history, talk about tagsoup and quirks mode and the like, not to
mention IE6 workarounds.
But I will desist.
I _will_ say that XML-formed is legal HTML5, and if your texinfo-to-HTML
tool produces well formed XML (which there is no real reason why it
can't) then all browser will get the same internal DOM representation
and there will be no rendering surprises in modern browsers (and few in
old browsers).
- Re: HTML-Info design, (continued)
- Re: HTML-Info design, Yuri Khan, 2014/12/28
- Re: HTML-Info design, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Nic Ferrier, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Steinar Bang, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, David Kastrup, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design,
Steinar Bang <=
- Re: HTML-Info design, Yuri Khan, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/28
- Re: HTML-Info design, Achim Gratz, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/29
- Re: HTML-Info design, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/28
- Re: HTML-Info design, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/28