[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info mus
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:30:12 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> Google substitutes better quality with graceful failure based on
> heuristics. That works for some things better than others. It
> certainly will not help much replacing a "concept index" since the whole
> point of a concept index is _not_ to be based on exact keywords.
>
Which is also true for Google, beacuse it automatically finds
alternate keywords (e.g. close file -> kill buffer) and it does it
better than any manually compiled index, because it takes into
account lots more variations.
I think the main point is what Stephen brough up earlier, that
trying to add all variations to the index is a waste of time,
because new users can (and do) use Google to find things,
while experienced users know where to look in the manual, and
they can also use Google of course.
So the effort of expanding the index to contain more variation
of terminology is much better spent on improving other areas
of Emacs instead.
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, (continued)
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/22
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/22
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/23
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/23
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/12/23
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/24
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/12/25
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die,
Tom <=
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Tom, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/26
- RE: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Drew Adams, 2014/12/26
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/27
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/27
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/27