[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info mus
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:01:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Sven Axelsson <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 21 December 2014 at 17:47, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> FWIW, I see no such sluggishness at that page, using Google Chrome.
>>> The page loaded seemingly instantaneously, and both scroll-bar
>>> scrolling and incremental search (C-f in Chrome) also seem
>>> instantaneous.
>>>
>>> Am I missing something? Did you means something different from this?
>>
>> FWIW, using Safari on OS X 10.10, the page displays after 1.5s, scrolling
>> and searching works immediately, and the page is fully loaded, with all
>> of the more than 1000 images, in about 14s.
>
>
> That is remarkable. However for pages with that many images I would
> tell the image sizes in the HTML code and then do the actual loading
> of the images in the scroll event:
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/window.onscroll
It is not exactly going to make moving around more pleasant when any
scrolling results in reloading/rendering. Stuff like Google image
search does that, and while it delivers a fast first response,
scrolling/searching around gets more irritating.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, (continued)
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/20
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/20
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/12/20
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/21
- RE: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Drew Adams, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Sven Axelsson, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Yuri Khan, 2014/12/21
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/22
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Yuri Khan, 2014/12/22
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/22
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Steinar Bang, 2014/12/23
- Re: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Lennart Borgman, 2014/12/23
- [OT] HTML5, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/23