[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Generalizing find-definition
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Generalizing find-definition |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:58:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I could live with either `t' or a marker; we can make it more
> complicated later if some mode shows up with a real need. A marker is
> clearer than just `t', but someone has to be responsible for deleting
> the marker.
No, markers are automatically "deleted" by the GC (contrary to overlays).
Stefan
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, (continued)
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/11
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Helmut Eller, 2014/12/11
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/11
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Helmut Eller, 2014/12/11
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/11
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/11
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/11
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/12
- Re: Generalizing find-definition,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/13
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/12
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/10
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/10
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/10
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/10
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/11
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/10
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/10
- Re: Generalizing find-definition, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/08