[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch queue management systems
From: |
Achim Gratz |
Subject: |
Re: Patch queue management systems |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:43:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Steinar Bang writes:
> "username/feature" sounds like a good naming scheme and one that could
> cut down on the inevitable clutter (implicit blame).
I'd rather suggest features/<...>. Anyone not wanting to look at
feature branches would simply not get those refs and everyone else can
either import single feature branches or all of them with an additional
line in the config file.
> (and I still think having a separate feature branch git repository is a
> good idea. If that repository resides on the same server and is created
> with hardlinks to the real repo, it should also be cheap
> disk-usage-wise, at least initially....)
By using a branch prefix you can keep it in the same repository.
There's a multitude of ways to have a feature repository share the
objects with the main repository if you'd rather want that.
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves
- Re: Patch queue management systems, (continued)
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Steinar Bang, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems, David Kastrup, 2014/12/11
- Re: Patch queue management systems,
Achim Gratz <=