[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:34:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:
>> Until more people start contributing to the docs, it makes very little
>> sense to me to change the tools, and by that cut the branch on which
>> we sit, documentation-wise.
>
> You have this exactly backwards. Texinfo/info are a barrier that impedes
> more recruitment of hands to work on documentation. This is one of the
> reasons they must die.
HTML is not a suitable source format for documentation but a target
format, and AsciiDoc is an even larger barrier. It's not well-defined
and has no canonical and/or reliable implementation.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, (continued)
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Steinar Bang, 2014/12/06
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/05
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Glenn Morris, 2014/12/05
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/12/06
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/12/05