[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:42:08 +0200 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:08:11 +0900
>
> > That's one of the reasons why I prefer not to poke the text with
> > additional directional controls.
>
> You don't need to poke them into the text. You just MUST display IRIs
> "as if" there were an effective embedding.
We don't (yet) have the machinery to do that, except by inserting an
LRE.
> I think for the cases we've identified so far (LTR-only text in a RTL
> context, RTL-only text in an LTR context, and directional controls
> embedded in an IRI) you probably want to require the user who clicks
> on them to confirm that they want to follow this misleading link,
> anyway.
That's something for Lars to worry about, I will just provide the
detection infrastructure.
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/01
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/02
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/02
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/03
Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/01
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/01
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/01
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/01
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/01
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/02
- Re: Bidirectional text and URLs, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/02